Jerome Gambit
ECO C50intermediate
The Jerome Gambit gives away a bishop on f7 and a knight on e5 to drag Black's king into the open, and it is objectively losing. It survives because the defence is genuinely uncomfortable: the black king stands on f7 with pieces hanging and checks arriving, and finding the right moves at the board is harder than the evaluation suggests. This page treats it as what it is — a trap worth understanding from the defending side, and a lesson in why material still wins when you keep your head.
Main line
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 7.Qd5+ Ke8
Diagram shows the position after 6 half-moves of the main line. On SpeakChess you can drill this line move by move — the trainer plays the other side and corrects you instantly, then spaced repetition schedules each variation so you review it right before you would forget it.
Move by move
The first 12 moves of the main line, explained one at a time. Every move of every variation is annotated like this inside the trainer — this page shows the opening moves so you can judge the explanations before signing up.
Win rates by rating
Results from real online games, measured after the line shown in each row. Most opening sites show one aggregate number — how an opening scores depends heavily on who is playing it.
| Rating | Games | White wins | Draws | Black wins | Position after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400-600 | 893 | 50.2% | 7.3% | 42.6% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 |
| 600-800 | 95 | 40% | 5.3% | 54.7% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 800-1000 | 682 | 44.4% | 2.8% | 52.8% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 1000-1200 | 210 | 44.8% | 2.4% | 52.9% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 1200-1400 | 5,035 | 44.1% | 3.2% | 52.7% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 1400-1600 | 6,706 | 46.3% | 2.8% | 51% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 1600-1800 | 551 | 49.5% | 3.3% | 47.2% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 1800-2000 | 390 | 49% | 3.8% | 47.2% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 2000-2200 | 188 | 54.8% | 1.1% | 44.2% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
| 2200-2400 | 44 | 43.2% | 4.5% | 52.3% | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 |
Most played continuations (1400-1600 rating)
After 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6:
- Qxc5 — played 68% of the time (White wins 43.1%, draws 2.9%, Black wins 54%)
- Qd5+ — played 29.2% of the time (White wins 55.4%, draws 2.5%, Black wins 42.1%)
- Qf5+ — played 2.2% of the time (White wins 29.9%, draws 3.4%, Black wins 66.7%)
Related openings
Frequently asked questions
Is the Jerome Gambit ever sound?
No. Black is two pieces up after the sacrifices and every engine gives a decisive advantage from move five. There is no line in which White has genuine compensation; the entire value of the gambit is that the defence must be found over the board, quickly, by a human.
How should Black refute it?
Return material to break the attack and finish developing. Trying to hold every piece keeps the king exposed and gives White the tactical chances he was hoping for. Handing back one piece to reach a safe position with an extra piece is the cleanest path, and it is nearly always available.
Why is it worth learning at all?
Because someone will play it against you, and the position is unpleasant if you have never seen it. It is also a clear illustration of a broader principle: a sacrifice that only works because the defender is surprised is refuted by knowing about it, which is the whole reason to look at unsound gambits.
Learn the Jerome Gambit for free
Interactive move-by-move training, ELO-calibrated sparring bots that actually play these lines, and spaced-repetition reviews. No installs, free to start.